COMPARE TOP FIVE TRANSCRIPTION SERVICES

 Transcription is a term that operates in converting video and audio sound into the written text. This conversion is mostly used in medical and judicial audio and visual sounds. It is attempted manually and through software. Transcribing is crucial in journalism while quoting someone from another source or transcribing the personal audio sounds. The market is bombarded with speech software. They offer 98% accuracy but the service can’t be compared with the manual one. Languagers have compared the top five transcription services for its readers to compare and decide which to choose. However, the decision is completely up to the reader. The research is conducted to educate the readers about transcription services providers. 

Rev: 

It is rated as an outstanding transcription and translation services provider. The ratings are completely from the user’s side without being biased. It has a super affordable package for its consumers and with that, it offers easy editing and top-notch accuracy. However, thorns always stick to the roses. It has its cons as well but that is much low than the pros. It has no subscription model that makes it hard for the user to decide which to hire. 

Languagers: 

From top to bottom this company holds second place among the top transcription providers. It has made its significant presence among the competitors as it is offering transcriptionists on a temporary and permanent basis. These are professionals that understand the terminology used in these fields that helps to transcribe accurately. It deals with English, Spanish, Hindi, and other foreign languages. That speaks of its diversity and dedication towards clients’ expectations. However, it has its cons in that it has no mobile app. 

Scribie 

This company is positioned at the third rank with solid transcription services with accuracy in its work. It is placed on this rank by the viewer’s choice as it contains affordable rates and client-centric customer support services. The cons it has are its weird website interface that hinders problems while searching for the desired package. Another problem is it also does not contain mobile applications. In the age of apps, it is way easier to operate services through mobile apps rather than by websites. 

Go Transcript: 

This company is ranked fourth. It offers human-based transcription. As in today’s age when the automatic software is popular in easing up the work. Manual work is attempted to proofread the software version that makes the output more accurate. However, that could be the reason for its ratings. But it is providing quality services that are better than many other transcription services providers. It has super amazing pros as it contains a mobile app which is a win-win situation. In addition, it provides free trials and good turnaround times in testing. The cons it bears are extra charges. 

Transcription Panda: 

With that being researched Transcription Panda is the top fifth transcription provider that is famous for its accuracy and friendly user interface. The pros it holds are flexible options for clients. The cons it has are the abruption in uploading files with no mobile app.  

Conclusion: 

Above the top five transcription services are compared. This research is conducted merely for the readers to choose wisely. The top five services are ranked as Rev, Languagers, Scribie, Go transcript, and transcription panda. Besides, there are many other services but these five are on the top. Therefore, stay tuned with the languagers to learn more. 

Webex Teams or Zoom ASL – Which One is Better for the Deaf?

Which video conferencing platform is better for deaf participants, Webex Teams or Zoom? If you are a deaf person or need to conduct a video conference call with someone who is deaf, you’re probably trying to find the best platform for the discussion. 

 

What you’ll want to look for is accessibility. Which video conferencing platform offers the most accessibility to disabled users, especially those who are hard of hearing? That is the question we will attempt to answer in this article.  

 

The two most popular platforms right now are Webex Teams and Zoom. They became very popular during the recent pandemic because more people were stuck at home. Let’s see which one is better for deaf people. 

 

Webex Teams 

 

Cisco Webex calls itself the leading enterprise software solution for conducting online meetups and video conferences. It is closely connected to Microsoft Outlook via the Webex Productivity Tools package. With a combination of these tools, Webex provides users with several different levels of accessibility. Hearing and seeing impaired users can both benefit from it.  

 

When you have a deaf person on a Webex video conference call, you can have a human captioner type all the spoken words into the media viewer window on the screen. You can use this as an alternative to a live interpreter or as an extra way for the deaf person to see the words that were spoken.  

 

Sometimes a deaf person might want to look back at the captions to review what was said. Webex offers transcription services to any user who has enabled the “Network-Based Recordings” feature. But if the deaf person prefers to look at the ASL interpreter’s hands only, they will have a clear picture of them.  

 

When someone speaks on a video call, the software automatically will show their video over everyone else’s video feed. But if you want to keep the interpreter’s video feed on the top to see their hands, you can “pin” the video to stay on top. Then you can still hear the words of the speaker while watching the hands of the interpreter.  

 

Zoom 

 

Zoom is rated number one for accessibility. It has a plethora of features to make it more accessible to the disabled community. Firstly, it has an automated captions feature, which translates the spoken words without the need for a human captioner or translator. Of course, the automated captioner feature is not 100% accurate. You’re much better off with a human ASL interpreter to ensure the accuracy of what was spoken.  

 

Zoom makes it easy for deaf participants to see the interpreter’s hands. It lets participants adjust the size of their video feeds, so the interpreter’s video feed is larger than the other feeds. And if they want to look back on what was interpreted, they can record the live feeds and play them later. Use the cloud recording option for the best playback quality.  

 

To make the interpreter’s video larger, right-click on the window and choose “Spotlight Video.” If you want to switch back to the speaker, right-click on the window and choose “Remove Spotlight.” Then go to the speaker’s window and choose “Spotlight Video.” It is a very straightforward process and should be simple enough for anyone to understand. 

 

If you want to turn on the automatic captioner for the speaker’s video and look at the interpreter’s window simultaneously, you can resize both windows to be the same size next to each other. There are just so many options to utilise for deaf people like Languagers provides.  

 

The Verdict 

 

In the end, the choice comes down to which platform people are comfortable with the most. Since Zoom continues to be the dominate video conferencing platform, you’ll come across more people who use it. So, you mine as well learn how to use it yourself.